Gary L. Teeter

for Ohio Senate
     33rd District

 


 

 

Gary's Views I believe the 14th amendment of the Bill of Rights, clearly states the parameters for protection for all individuals.
   

 


Note These website articles are for bringing attention to issues facing our nation and world today. The links to the sites that host  their featured information are listed so that you may visit them to view and derive your own conclusions and opinions.
   
  The 9th Amendment
The 9th amendment was added to the Bill of Rights to ensure that the maxim expressio unius est exclusio alterius would not be used at a later time to deny fundamental rights merely because they were not specifically enumerated in the Constitution
.
 
  "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

 

 

Section 1of the 14th Amendment
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
 

  Bobby Cutts Convicted of Murdering Jessie Davis, Unborn Daughter

"Defense attorneys asked Stark County Common Pleas Judge Charles E. Brown Jr. to declare a mistrial, saying the not guilty verdict on aggravated murder for Davis was inconsistent with an aggravated murder conviction for the fetus. Both allegations were based on the same facts, the defense said.

Brown rejected the request and said he had studied related court rulings and found that the allegations involved separate individuals: Davis and the fetus."

 

 

 

Bobby Cutts Convicted of Murdering Jessie Davis, Unborn Daughter

 

 

 

 

 

GUILTY: CANTON, Ohio (AP) - A former police officer who tearfully told jurors he accidentally killed his pregnant lover was convicted Friday of murdering her and their unborn child.

Bobby Cutts Jr. could face the death penalty. He had testified that he killed Jessie Davis with an elbow blow to the throat during a disagreement and dumped the body in a park in a panic.

He sat with his hands on his lap and held his head erect without emotion as the verdicts were read.

Prosecutors told the jury that Cutts killed Davis, 26, and the unborn baby last June at her Lake Township home to get out of child support payments for a fourth child.

The couple's 2½-year-old son Blake, who was found home alone, gave investigators their first clues to his mother's disappearance when he said, "Mommy's crying. Mommy broke the table. Mommy's in the rug," and later, "Daddy's mad."

For more than a week, Cutts denied knowledge of her whereabouts as thousands searched in the area last summer. He finally led authorities to the body, wrapped in a comforter and left in a park about 20 miles from her home.

Cutts, 30, was convicted of aggravated murder in the death of the nearly full-term female fetus, for which he could receive the death penalty, life in prison without parole or life with parole eligibility after 20, 25 or 30 years. Jurors, who gave their decision on their fourth day of deliberations, found him not guilty of aggravated murder in Davis' death, a count that includes intent to kill with prior calculation and design. But they convicted him of a lesser charge of murder in her death.

Cutts, who resigned from the Canton police, also was convicted of abuse of a corpse, burglary and child endangering for leaving Blake by himself.

Defense attorneys asked Stark County Common Pleas Judge Charles E. Brown Jr. to declare a mistrial, saying the not guilty verdict on aggravated murder for Davis was inconsistent with an aggravated murder conviction for the fetus. Both allegations were based on the same facts, the defense said.

Brown rejected the request and said he had studied related court rulings and found that the allegations involved separate individuals: Davis and the fetus.

Davis' divorced parents, sitting three seats away from each other, clenched their jaws during the verdict reading. Cutts' relatives held hands and one sniffled into a tissue. The judge had warned against outbursts in the courtroom, and it remained quiet enough to hear benches gently creaking as people shifted in their seats.

Outside the courthouse, defense attorney Fernando Mack said he wouldn't comment about the case, citing a gag order. He shrugged his shoulders when asked about the verdict and said Cutts was "doing OK."

There was no indication from the defense team whether Cutts, who was a surprise witness at his trial, would take the stand at the sentencing phase to plead for his life.

Cutts, dressed in a dark gray suit, was led from the courtroom by deputies with his hands cuffed behind by his back.

Assistant County Prosecutor Dennis Barr declined comment. The Cutts and Davis families left without commenting.

Cutts testified for four hours Monday, saying that he accidentally killed Davis with an elbow to her neck as he was trying to leave her house and she didn't want him to go. He said he then panicked.

His attorneys said his actions in dumping the body and leaving the little boy alone didn't prove he intended to kill Davis.

"Does that cause you to feel that he's a liar and a cheat and he's going to lie about everything else?" defense attorney Mack asked during his closing argument Tuesday. "None of that will tell you whether aggravated murder was committed on the morning of June 14th."

Defense attorneys also stressed that there was no forensic evidence linking Cutts to the death and that a medical examiner couldn't determine how Davis died because of decomposition from nine days of exposure in the summer heat.

But Barr told the jury that Cutts' story made no sense and said a police officer wouldn't hide a body unless he was covering up a criminal act. He noted Cutts' testimony that he sprayed down his truck after getting rid of Davis' body because of bugs on his windshield.

"Is that reasonable?" Barr asked. "Or is it more reasonable to think that he stopped and washed that truck to get rid of trace evidence?"

The prosecution's key witness, Cutts' longtime friend Myisha Ferrell, testified that Cutts picked her up in his truck the morning of June 14 with Davis' body in the back and help up his right arm to demonstrate how he killed her.

Jurors will return Feb. 25 to hear evidence on whether to recommend the death penalty. The judge warned jurors not to discuss the case.

 

H.B. 102, Umbilical Cord Blood Donation

 

 

 

On June 30, 2009, the Ohio Senate Health, Human Services & Aging Committee passed H.B. 102 by a vote of 9-0. The Ohio House had previously passed the bill 97-0 on June 3.

H.B. 102, which is sponsored by Rep. Todd Book, would require the Ohio Department of Health to place printable information on umbilical cord blood banking and donation on its website. The Department of Health would encourage health care professionals to provide the information to pregnant women.

Umbilical cord blood is an ethical and non-controversial source of stem cells that can be obtained with no risk to the mother or child. Stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood have been used to successfully treat over 70 diseases including sickle cell anemia, leukemia, and lymphoma. Unfortunately, most umbilical cord blood is currently being discarded after birth.

Cord blood is often matched by racial and ethnic background and many patients who are most in need of a transplant cannot find a suitable match. A March 2007 Detroit News article indicated that, at that time, about 50% of whites found the cord blood matches they needed, while only 18% of African-Americans did.

Banking cord blood for personal or family use with a private bank can involve significant expense. However, donations to public cord blood banks involve no expense for the donor.
 

   

 

S.C.R. 6, Opposing Freedom of Choice Act

   

 

Senator Tim Grendell's Testamony   

Click here for complete document

Senator Steve Buehrer's Testimony 

Click here for complete document

Pro-Life State Senators Tim Grendell and Steve Buehrer introduced a resolution in the Ohio Senate opposing the federal "Freedom of Choice Act" (FOCA) on March 3, 2009.

The resolution (S.R.C. 6), which urges the President and Congress to oppose FOCA, states that:

"The Freedom of Choice Act is a radical attempt to enshrine abortion-on-demand into American law, to sweep aside existing laws that the majority of Americans support, such as requirements involving fully informed consent, parental involvement, and that licensed physicians perform abortions, and seeks to prevent states from enacting similar protective laws in the future."

S.C.R. 6 was co-sponsored by Pro-Life Senators Kevin Coughlin, Bob Gibbs, Tim Schaffer, Bill Seitz, Mark Wagoner, Kirk Schuring, and Keith Faber.

On Tuesday, June 16, 2009, the Ohio Senate Health, Human Services and Aging Committee passed S.C.R. 6 by a vote of 6 to 3.

Committee members voting the Pro-Life position FOR S.C.R. 6 were: Chairman Kevin Coughlin; Steve Buehrer; Karen Gillmor; David Goodman; Kirk Schuring; and Jimmy Stewart.

Committee members voting the Pro-Abortion position AGAINST S.C.R. 6 were: Ray Miller; Sue Morano; and Shirley Smith.

 

   

 

H.B. 280, the Protecting Pregnant Women from Coercion & Violence Bill

   
 

On January 6, 2009, Governor Ted Strickland signed Sub. H.B. 280, the Protecting Pregnant Women from Coercion & Violence Act. In addition to protecting pregnant women from violence and coerced abortions, the new law will allow proof of a pattern of failing to report known or suspected child sexual abuse in a lawsuit for damages against abortion facilities or others who are required to report child abuse.

Sub. H.B. 280, which was sponsored by Rep. Michelle Schneider, will:

1) Require abortion facilities to post a "No One Can Force You to Have an Abortion" poster;
2) Require mandatory minimum prison sentences for assault and increase penalties for domestic violence if the offender knew the victim was pregnant;
3) Permit recovery of compensatory and exemplary damages and use of reports of prior abuse incidents (with identifying information removed) in a civil action for failure to file required reports of known or suspected child abuse; and,
4) Provide mandatory prison sentences and payment of restitution to victims in cases of "human trafficking" for prostitution.

H.B. 280 became effective on April 7, 2009.

 

   

 

S.B. 304, Safe Havens Bill

   

On December 23, 2008, Ohio Governor Ted Strickland signed a bill that greatly expands the timeframe for taking a newborn baby to a "safe haven" as an alternative to unsafe abandonment. S.B. 304, which was sponsored by pro-life Senator Gary Cates, increases the timeframe that a parent could voluntarily deliver a newborn to a safe location from 72 hours to 30 days after birth. The bill also requires the state to develop a plan to educate "at-risk populations" about the Safe Havens law. Ohio Right to Life promoted and testified in support of the bill.

Ohio's Safe Havens Law provides immunity from criminal prosecution for parental abandonment of a newborn, who has not been abused, to a peace officer, a hospital worker, or an emergency medical service worker. "Safe Havens" laws, which have been adopted in all 50 states, are intended to reduce infanticide and unsafe newborn abandonment.

The Ohio Department of Job and Family Services reports that, between April 2001, when Ohio's Safe Havens law went into effect, and June 30, 2007, 54 babies have been safely surrendered under the law. The National Council for Adoption reports that over 1,000 newborns have been surrendered under such laws in the U.S. The majority of state Safe Havens laws have timeframes longer than 72 hours.

S.B. 304 became effective on March 24, 2009.

   

 

H.B. 7, Adoption Reform Bill

   
 

On January 6, 2009, Governor Ted Strickland signed Sub. H.B. 7, the Adoption Reform Act. Among other things, the new law allows birth mothers to receive from adopting parents up to $3,000 for a birth mother's living expenses during pregnancy and the 60 days after birth. As the economy continues to deteriorate, the plight of pregnant young women has worsened as Ohio's recession and unemployment intensifies. This new law will remove a tremendous financial burden on young pregnant mothers and hopefully increase the number of adoptions statewide. Far too often the reason for abortions is centered on financial constraints.

Additionally, the new law requires that instruction on "adoption as an option" for unintended pregnancies to be included in state-mandated educational curriculums, as well as the "GRADS" and "LEAP" programs for pregnant and parenting students.

Sub. H.B. 7 became effective on April 7, 2009.
 

 
   
 

Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution

 
  "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."
   
   
 

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

 
 
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article

 

   

top of page